Sample Report Preview

— Fictional Data for Illustration Only
← Back to Services · Guides & Resources
About this sample: This preview shows selected pages from a Calculation of Value report — our core deliverable. The actual report typically runs 15–25 pages and includes additional sections not shown here, including a detailed company overview, economic and industry analysis, comparable transaction exhibit, glossary of terms, and analyst certification. Every engagement is governed by NACVA Professional Standards and tailored to the subject company.
What a reviewer checks
Can I trace it?
Every figure names its source, and related-party and non-recurring items are handled explicitly. Notes 1, 3, 4, 5.
Is the judgment documented?
Weighting, benefit-stream selection, and the chosen multiple each carry a stated reason. Notes 2, 6, 8.
What was ruled out — and why?
Approaches not applied and discounts not taken are recorded with their basis. Notes 7, 9.
What is this not?
A Calculation of Value is not a Conclusion of Value, and the report says so. Note 10.
CALCULATION REPORT
Business Valuation
Clinica del Valle Medical Group, PSC
As of December 31, 2025
Report Date: March 15, 2026
Prepared By:
Certified Valuation Analyst
AXIS Independent Advisory
NACVA Member | CVA Designated
CONFIDENTIAL
Cover Page
Executive Summary

Clinica del Valle Medical Group, PSC | Professional Services Corp | Valuation Date: December 31, 2025 | Standard: Fair Market Value1

AXIS Independent Advisory was retained to provide a calculation of value of 100% of the ownership interests of Clinica del Valle Medical Group, PSC ("the Company"), a multi-physician general medical practice operating in Ponce, Puerto Rico. This engagement was performed under NACVA Professional Standards and AICPA SSVS No. 1 as a Calculation of Value for internal succession planning purposes.

The Analyst considered the market, income, and asset-based approaches, and applied the market approach using comparable transaction data from market transaction databases. The basis for the approaches applied and not applied is set out in the Valuation Conclusion. The SDE Multiple Method received 70% weighting based on 6 selected comparable transactions (observed median 1.85x SDE). The Revenue Multiple Method received 30% weighting as a corroborating indicator.2 Historical financial data for fiscal years 2021 through 2025 was analyzed, with normalizing adjustments applied to reported earnings to reflect the economic benefit available to a single owner-operator.

Calculated Value — 100% Ownership Interest (Illustrative)
$1,150,000

The sections that follow provide the detailed analyses, data, and rationale supporting this conclusion.

Executive Summary — Page 1
Analyst Notes AXIS commentary on the executive summary. Not part of the report a client receives.
  1. Basis before number. The standard of value, the premise, and the valuation date appear before any figure. A reader can confirm what the engagement measured before seeing what it concluded.
  2. Weighting disclosed in the summary. Method weighting appears here, not buried in a later exhibit. The reader sees how the conclusion was reached before seeing the conclusion.

Like what you see? The full report includes even more depth.

I need a valuation → I want to refer a client →
IV. Financial Summary and Normalizing Adjustments
Historical Financial Performance
Line Item 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $1,820,000 $1,950,000 $2,080,000 $2,150,000 $2,210,000
Cost of Services $728,000 $780,000 $832,000 $860,000 $884,000
Gross Profit $1,092,000 $1,170,000 $1,248,000 $1,290,000 $1,326,000
Gross Margin 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0%
Operating Expenses $765,000 $810,000 $852,000 $885,000 $910,000
Net Income $327,000 $360,000 $396,000 $405,000 $416,000
Normalizing Adjustments (Most Recent Year)
Adjustment Amount Rationale
Reported Net Income $416,000 Per Form 1120-S, FY2025
+ Owner/Physician Compensation $185,000 W-2 salary + K-1 distributions to principal physician
+ Depreciation & Amortization $32,000 Non-cash. Per Form 4562.3
+ Interest Expense $8,000 Equipment financing. Buyer decision.
+ Personal/Discretionary $14,000 Personal vehicle, cell phone, travel per GL detail
+ Non-Recurring Items $22,000 FY2025: one-time EHR system migration costs5
+ Rent Adjustment $6,000 Related-party lease below market ($3,500/mo vs. $4,000/mo est.)4
Normalized SDE $683,000

The normalized SDE of $683,000 for fiscal year 2025 was selected as the representative benefit stream, reflecting the Company's current operating performance and steady revenue growth over the analysis period.6

Financial Summary — Page 5
Analyst Notes AXIS commentary on the financial summary. Not part of the report a client receives.
  1. Source traceability. Every normalizing adjustment names its source document — Form 1120-S, Form 4562, general ledger detail. A reviewer traces each figure without having to ask.
  2. Related-party terms adjusted to market. The lease is adjusted to market and the delta is shown. Undisclosed related-party terms are among the most common defects in owner-prepared financials.
  3. Non-recurring items removed once. Identified individually and removed once. They are not used to smooth a trend.
  4. The benefit stream is a stated selection. FY2025 was selected rather than a multi-year average, and the reason is on the page. A default is not a decision.
VI. Valuation Conclusion
Approaches Considered

Consistent with NACVA Professional Standards, all three generally accepted approaches to value were considered. The approaches applied, and the basis for excluding those not applied, are set out below.

Approach Applied Basis
Market Approach Yes — primary Adequate transaction data available for comparable owner-operated practices; directly observable pricing evidence.
Income Approach No Management did not prepare forecasts, and historical earnings do not support a reliable projection independent of the current owner-physician. A capitalized-earnings indication would restate the same benefit stream already captured in the SDE multiple.7
Asset-Based Approach Considered — not weighted Applied as a reasonableness check only. Adjusted net asset value is materially below the earnings-based indications, consistent with a going-concern practice whose value derives from earnings rather than tangible assets. Not appropriate as a primary indication under a going-concern premise.
Market Approach — Method Weighting
Method Indicated Value Weight Weighted Value
SDE Multiple Method (1.68x) $1,147,440 70% $803,208
Revenue Multiple Method (0.52x) $1,149,200 30% $344,760
Weighted Indication of Value 100% $1,147,968

The SDE Multiple Method received 70% weight based on a set of 6 transactions in NAICS 621111 (Offices of Physicians) meeting the screening criteria described in the Comparable Transactions exhibit. The selected multiple of 1.68x falls below the observed median of 1.85x, reflecting the Company's owner-physician dependency, limited management depth, and Puerto Rico-specific geographic risk factors.8 The Revenue Multiple Method received 30% weight as a corroborating indicator; it is weighted lower because revenue multiples do not capture differences in margin structure between the subject and the comparable set.

No discount for lack of control (DLOC) was applied because the subject interest is a 100% controlling interest. No separate discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) was applied because the selected multiples derive from completed sales of whole, privately held practices, in which limited marketability is already reflected in the observed transaction pricing. Applying a further DLOM would double-count that factor.9

Calculated Value — 100% Ownership Interest (Illustrative)
$1,150,000
Standard of Value: Fair Market Value  ·  Premise of Value: Going Concern

(Rounded to reflect the imprecision inherent in the valuation process.) This is a Calculation of Value performed under NACVA Professional Standards using approaches and procedures agreed in advance with the client. It is not a Conclusion of Value, and a Conclusion of Value may have differed had one been performed.10

Valuation Conclusion — Page 8
Analyst Notes AXIS commentary on the valuation conclusion. Not part of the report a client receives.
  1. Approaches considered, and non-application explained. All three approaches are addressed in a table stating whether each was applied and on what basis. The income approach was not applied, and the reason is given rather than left to inference.
  2. The multiple is justified against the observed median. The selected 1.68x sits below the observed median of 1.85x, and the reasons are named. A multiple without a reason is an assertion.
  3. Discounts considered and ruled out, with reason. DLOM and DLOC were each considered and not applied, with the basis stated. What was ruled out matters as much as what was applied.
  4. Engagement type and rounding stated plainly. The report states this is a Calculation of Value, not a Conclusion of Value, and that a Conclusion may have differed. Rounding is disclosed as inherent imprecision rather than presented as precision.
What Every Calculation of Value Includes
Cover Page — Branded, confidential
Table of Contents — Section-by-section navigation
Executive Summary — Key findings at a glance
Introduction & Scope — Purpose, standard, premise of value
Company Overview — Business description, ownership, operations
Economic & Industry Conditions — National, Puerto Rico, and sector context
Financial Summary — 3-5 year income statement + normalization
Valuation Approaches — Methods applied with documented rationale
Glossary of Terms — 28 terms defined in plain English
Assumptions & Conditions — NACVA-compliant limiting conditions
Analyst Certification — Signed certification with credentials
AI Use Disclosure — Statement of technology-assisted procedures per NACVA advisory guidance
Comparable Transactions — Full exhibit with screening methodology

Reports are delivered in English. Service is conducted bilingually in English and Spanish. Typical turnaround: 2–3 weeks from complete documents. Includes an analyst walkthrough call.

What you've seen is a preview. The full deliverable includes more depth, more analysis, and a complete methodology discussion — all governed by NACVA Professional Standards.

Ready to move forward?

Whether you're a business owner or a referring advisor, the next step is a brief conversation.

I need a valuation → I want to refer a client →
← Back to Services · Guides & Resources